yea, im leaning more to the random side.
anyone see why this wouldnt work tho?
- your system doubles it self in a 24hr peroid more than 50% of days .
- when the days bets double, remove 1/2 and start the next day with the base bank again
surely this would work?
if 100 days are tested and 80% are "doubled" days, the chances of the next 100 days being below 50% are very slim. and even if the 2nd hundred days strike rate was above 20% (extreamly rare) we would be in profit for the 200 day peroid???
or
@ 80% win rate
start bank $100
2 of every 10 lays are -$100 days
8 of every 10 days are +$100 days
after 100 days, new bank $7300 !
and this is not compounding
i could be missing something?
the only possible system faliure is if the amount of success days drops below 50%, so how many test days would give a safe probability?