Pages:
Actions
  • #91 by Nettuno on 10 Dec 2012
  • Thank!!!!

    Run test Now!!!!!!

    Edit.:
    There's only game in 2 hours.
    Put the results in +or- 4 hours
  • #92 by mcbee on 11 Dec 2012
  • hi
    there is a problem with the new version .41
    it does not execute the markets name contains "xx"
    it works ok with v.39


    mcbee
  • #93 by Nettuno on 11 Dec 2012
  • Quote from: mcbee on 11 Dec 2012, 00:54
    hi
    there is a problem with the new version .41
    it does not execute the markets name contains "xx"
    it works ok with v.39


    mcbee

    I was trying to find some reason for not having been no bet on the last test.

    I'm going back to the old version and do the test again.

    Thanks.
  • #94 by mcbee on 11 Dec 2012
  • hi mark/all
    i have come across another problem.
    the triggers bet ok on the 1.5 market
    another goal was scored
    then placed a lay bet to be matched, all ok
    there must have been a card or something because when i looked again the lay bet had vanished.
    so the lay and green triggers need
    and selections lay matched is equal to 0
    and selections lay unmatched is equal to 0
    set both triggers to no more than 5.00 secs
    this will make sure that the lay bet is placed again.

    mcbee
  • #95 by MarkV on 11 Dec 2012
  • Hi
    redundant pscore condition removed from lay trigger
    mcbee's last suggestion incorporated in the attached file.
  • #96 by Nettuno on 11 Dec 2012
  • Hi!!

    I had big problens this morning.

    Happened a big rain and storng winds in my hometown and I was without internet.

    But now it's all right.

    I run (version 6) test now!!!!
  • #97 by Nettuno on 11 Dec 2012
  • Very, very, very close!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Only one thing is wrong.

    The output when the loss is less than 25%.

    He does not put the output at 0%.

    Very thank you.
  • #98 by MarkV on 12 Dec 2012
  • Hi
    For LAY trigger price box:

    If current loss is equal or greater than 25%: bm_backp*1.35
    If current loss is less than 25%: 0% loss<I'm not sure I think lay_price, please suggest the calculation if lay_price is wrong>  

    You need an IF statement in the price box.

    IF(lay_price>=bm_backp*(100+25)/100,bm_backp*1.35,lay_price)
                                                           or the correct formula  ^
  • #99 by Nettuno on 12 Dec 2012
  • What value assumes the MF for BM_backp?
  • #100 by pcal72 on 12 Dec 2012
  • Quote from: Nettuno on 12 Dec 2012, 13:59
    What value assumes the MF for BM_backp?

    Hi

    If lay bet are placed at bm_backp it will close a o% profit and loss

    But note, bm_backp catch last back price picked so ir your bet are matched in various parts at various odds it will be a slitly different

    pcal
  • #101 by MarkV on 12 Dec 2012
  • Hi
    Thanks pcal

    Here is the updated trigger
  • #102 by Nettuno on 13 Dec 2012
  • Thanks Markv.

    Run test Now!!!
  • #103 by mcbee on 13 Dec 2012
  • hi
    this seems to be working ok now.
    BUT i have been messing about with the settings because when a back bet goes in and another goal is scored your in minus profit.
    NOW what i have done is set the time to 55 mfp minutes
    AND deleted all the don't bet if the other trigger has been activated.
    result
    before under 3.5 goals back .50 at 1.87 another goal lay .38 at 2.52 = .12 loss

    now under 3.5 back .50 at 1.87 another goal lay .38 at 2.52 = .12 loss
    then under 4.5 .50 at 1.76 no extra goal = .36 profit
    total .36-.12= .24 profit or half a point
    this works because it takes 2 more goals to wipe out the second back bet and if there is another goal then the 5.5 will kick in, so the result should then be a very small loss or profit.

    mcbee
  • #104 by MarkV on 13 Dec 2012
  • Hi mcbee
    Yes, I was looking at something similar, but for the full duration of the game, or to take a greenup somewhere along the way. In testing the original trigger, there was plenty opportunity for greening.

    I see it as a reverse of the two triggers below, but backing instead of laying, using level stakes, or partial recoupment instead of aggressive loss recovery
    http://marketfeeder.co.uk/solutions/staking-plans/over-under-martingale/
    http://marketfeeder.co.uk/solutions/staking-plans/lay-total-goals/
    although I think it will be difficult in low liquidity markets. Unfortunately not much time to work on it now, but might do over the hols.  
  • #105 by Nettuno on 14 Dec 2012
  • Sorry my bad inglish...

    I would like to give a big thanks to Markv, without your help I could not have done this strategy. From the bottom of my heart THANK YOU!!

    I also want to thank the McBee and Pcal, to help in the various parts.

    I run test today And it seems to be 100%.

    Tomorrow I will repeat the test.

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Quote from: MarkV on 13 Dec 2012, 19:52
    ... using level stakes, or partial recoupment instead of aggressive loss recovery
    http://marketfeeder.co.uk/solutions/staking-plans/over-under-martingale/


    Very interesting.
Pages:
Actions